For many years there was only one trustworthy way for you to keep data on a pc – with a hard disk drive (HDD). Nevertheless, this sort of technology is actually expressing it’s age – hard disks are actually noisy and slow; they are power–hungry and frequently create a great deal of warmth during serious operations.

SSD drives, alternatively, are swift, take in significantly less energy and are generally much cooler. They feature a whole new method of file accessibility and storage and are years in front of HDDs with regards to file read/write speed, I/O performance and also energy capability. See how HDDs fare against the modern SSD drives.

1. Access Time

Image

Resulting from a radical new method to disk drive functionality, SSD drives permit for considerably quicker data file access rates. Having an SSD, data access instances tend to be lower (as small as 0.1 millisecond).

Image

HDD drives make use of spinning disks for data storage uses. When a file will be accessed, you need to wait around for the appropriate disk to get to the right position for the laser beam to access the data file you want. This ends in an average access speed of 5 to 8 milliseconds.

2. Random I/O Performance

Image

Caused by the completely new radical data file storage strategy incorporated by SSDs, they give you a lot quicker file access speeds and faster random I/O performance.

In the course of AceHoster.com’s tests, all SSDs showed their capacity to handle at the least 6000 IO’s per second.

Image

Hard drives deliver slower file access rates as a result of older file storage space and access technology they’re implementing. And in addition they demonstrate considerably sluggish random I/O performance as opposed to SSD drives.

For the duration of AceHoster.com’s tests, HDD drives managed typically 400 IO operations per second.

3. Reliability

Image

SSD drives are designed to include as less rotating components as is possible. They utilize a comparable concept to the one utilized in flash drives and are also significantly more efficient compared with common HDD drives.

SSDs provide an normal failing rate of 0.5%.

Image

To have an HDD drive to operate, it needs to spin a few metal hard disks at more than 7200 rpm, having them magnetically stable in the air. There is a good deal of moving components, motors, magnets along with other devices jammed in a tiny location. So it’s no wonder that the standard rate of failing of the HDD drive varies among 2% and 5%.

4. Energy Conservation

Image

SSD drives are usually smaller than HDD drives and also they do not have virtually any moving components whatsoever. Consequently they don’t generate so much heat and need a lot less electricity to work and fewer power for cooling reasons.

SSDs take in between 2 and 5 watts.

Image

HDD drives are renowned for staying loud. They require extra power for air conditioning reasons. On a server which includes different HDDs running all of the time, you will need a lot of fans to ensure they are cooler – this may cause them a lot less energy–economical than SSD drives.

HDDs consume somewhere between 6 and 15 watts.

5. CPU Power

Image

SSD drives allow for quicker data accessibility speeds, which generally, subsequently, permit the CPU to finish data file requests considerably faster and after that to go back to other jobs.

The common I/O hold out for SSD drives is barely 1%.

Image

HDD drives support sluggish access rates when compared to SSDs do, resulting in the CPU being required to delay, although scheduling resources for the HDD to find and return the inquired file.

The typical I/O wait for HDD drives is about 7%.

6.Input/Output Request Times

Image

In the real world, SSDs perform as perfectly as they did for the duration of our trials. We produced an entire platform back–up using one of our own production servers. Over the backup operation, the standard service time for I/O demands was basically under 20 ms.

Image

Throughout the same tests with the exact same server, this time fitted out with HDDs, general performance was considerably slow. Throughout the server data backup procedure, the average service time for any I/O calls ranged somewhere between 400 and 500 ms.

7. Backup Rates

Image

You can easily notice the real–world potential benefits to having SSD drives day–to–day. For instance, on a server furnished with SSD drives, a complete backup is going to take simply 6 hours.

Image

Over time, we have made use of mostly HDD drives with our web servers and we are knowledgeable of their efficiency. With a server furnished with HDD drives, a complete server back up typically takes around 20 to 24 hours.

With AceHoster.com, you may get SSD–equipped website hosting services at affordable prices. The shared website hosting plans as well as our VPS plans feature SSD drives by default. Apply for an account along with us and witness how your sites will become far better instantaneously.

  • Service guarantees

  •  
  • Sign up now. There won’t be any installation service fees and you will have full admin access to your server. 99.9% network availability is warranted.

  • Compare our prices

  •  
  • Examine the allocations and capabilities offered by our Virtual Private Servers. You could start with a cheaper VPS setup and upgrade with simply a click as your demands increase.
  • Compare our hosting plans

  • Contact Us

  •  
  • It is easy to make contact with us 7 days a week by email or by making use of our super–fast ticketing system. AceHoster.com offers a 1–hour response time guarantee.